Mullin
Mullin v. City of Mountain View, California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 TYGHE JAMES MULLIN, Case No. 25-cv-02191-BLF
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
APPLICATION TO PROCEED
v. IN FORMA PAUPERIS; SCREENING
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; AND
CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW, DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED CALIFORNIA, et al., COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND 11 Defendants. 12 Plaintiff Tyghe James Mullin, proceeding pro se, filed the complaint in this case on March 3, 2025, along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). See Compl., ECF 1; IFP Application, ECF 2. The case was assigned to Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi, who conditionally granted the application and ordered service of process by the U.S. Marshal. See Order, ECF 4. Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”) on March 20, 2025. See FAC, ECF 7. Judge DeMarchi did not screen the complaint or the FAC pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The case was reassigned to the undersigned judge…