Daniel Govind v. State of California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 DANIEL GOVIND, Case No. 5:23-cv-01080-JFW-JC
12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH v. LEAVE TO AMEND, DENYING MOTION TO GRANT CIVIL
SANCTION, AND DIRECTING
WARDEN JAMES S. HILL, et al., PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO
ORDER
16 Defendants. [DKT. NOS. 20, 22] 17 18 I. SUMMARY On June 7, 2023, Plaintiff Daniel Govind, who is proceeding pro se and has paid the filing fee, filed a Civil Rights Complaint (“Complaint” or “Comp.”) with exhibits against the following Defendants who are or were California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) employees working at the California Institution for Men in Chino, California (“CIM”): (1) Warden James S. Hill; (2) Correctional Sergeant Murray; (3) Correctional Officer Zuniga; (4) Supervising Cook Gusman; and (5) Michell Mejia, RN. (Docket (“Dkt.”) No. 1). Plaintiff sued all Defendants in both their individual and official capacities. (Comp. at 7-9 (as 28 …