Newsom

(PC) Coleman v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20252:90-cv-00520California436 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RALPH COLEMAN, et al., No. 2:90-cv-0520 KJM SCR P Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs are a class of prisoners proceeding through counsel in this action now in the remedial phase. The court has referred several matters to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 25, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within five days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.