(PS) Platts v. Western Refining Retail, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20252:23-cv-01823California624 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TOBIAS PLATTS, No. 2:23-CV-1823-TLN-DMC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS WESTERN REFINING RETAIL, LLC, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to compel. See ECF No. 19. No opposition was filed. The motion was set for hearing on March 5, 2025, before the undersigned in Redding, California. See ECF No. 21. At the hearing, Eric Welter, Esq., appeared via Zoom on behalf of Defendant and Plaintiff failed to appear. On March 6, 2025, the Court directed Plaintiff to appear in person on April 3, 2025, and show cause in writing to demonstrate why terminating sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with Rule 26 disclosures, and failure to comply with ECF No. 21. See ECF No. 22. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply may result in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.