UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 10 RAYNENE LUNT, Case No. 2:24-cv-02082-JAM-CSK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MODIFIED
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
V. (ECF No. 12) WALMART, INC.., et al., Defendants. 16 The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated protective order below (ECF No. 17 12), and finds it comports with the relevant authorities and the Court’s Local Rule. See 18 L.R. 141.1. The Court APPROVES the protective order, subject to the following 19 clarification. 20 The Court’s Local Rules indicate that once an action is closed, it “will not retain 21 jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in that action.” L.R. 22 141.1(f); see Bylin Heating Sys., Inc. v. Thermal Techs., Inc., 2012 WL 13237584, at *2 23 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2012) (noting that courts in the district generally do not retain 24 jurisdiction for disputes concerning protective orders after closure of the case). Thus, the 25 Court will not retain jurisdiction over this protective order once the case is closed. 26 Dated: April 4, 2025…