(PS) Narayan v. USAA Ins. Co.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PRAKASH NARAYAN, Case No. 2:24-cv-02256-WBS-CSK Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
v. (ECF No. 10) USAA INSURANCE CO., et al., Defendants. 16 Presently before the Court is a motion for reconsideration filed by Plaintiff Prakash Narayan on October 4, 2024. (ECF No. 10). Plaintiff is seeking reconsideration of Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim’s order denying Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time to file objections to Judge Kim’s August 27, 2024 Findings and Recommendations. Id. This action was closed on October 3, 2024. (ECF No. 9.) A court may properly reconsider its decision if it (1) is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law. Smith v. Clark Cnty. Sch. Dist., 727 F.3d 950, 955 (9th Cir. 2013). The choice to reconsider an order is left to the discretion of the court. See id. “A party…