(PS) Bevan v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20252:24-cv-02641California766 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUSSELL BEVAN and HEIDI LEE, No. 2:24-cv-2641-DAD-SCR Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiffs are proceeding pro se, and this matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiffs filed this action on September 30, 2024. The undersigned issued an Order to Show Cause (OSC) (ECF No. 5) noting that the complaint contained “wholly insubstantial and frivolous” allegations. The OSC pointed out that the jurisdictional statement was deficient, and that the complaint failed to state a claim. The OSC directed Plaintiffs to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction or failure to state a claim. ECF No. 5 at 4. Plaintiffs filed a response on January 31, 2025. ECF No. 6. Plaintiffs declare they are “transient foreigner[s]” and are “stateless person[s]” not subject to the jurisdiction of the federal 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.