Bondi
Velasco Vilchez v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 8, 202524-456California1,124 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 8 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NATALY AURORA VELASCO No. 24-456 VILCHEZ; GIANVICTOR IVAN Agency Nos.
ROMERO JUAREZ; M.V.R.V.; IVAN A220-747-854
ADRIANO ROMERO VELASCO, A220-747-853
A220-747-855
Petitioners,
A220-747-856
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 4, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: HURWITZ, KOH, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.
Nataly Velasco Vilchez (“Velasco”), her husband, Gianvictor Romero Juarez,
and their sons, natives and citizens of Peru, petition for review of a decision by the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing an appeal from an order of…