Bondi

Velasco Vilchez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 8, 202524-456California1,124 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 8 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NATALY AURORA VELASCO No. 24-456 VILCHEZ; GIANVICTOR IVAN Agency Nos.

ROMERO JUAREZ; M.V.R.V.; IVAN A220-747-854

ADRIANO ROMERO VELASCO, A220-747-853

A220-747-855

Petitioners,

A220-747-856

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 4, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: HURWITZ, KOH, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Nataly Velasco Vilchez (“Velasco”), her husband, Gianvictor Romero Juarez,

and their sons, natives and citizens of Peru, petition for review of a decision by the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing an appeal from an order of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.