Kaur

Kaur v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 8, 202524-2200California1,086 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 8 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAJWINDER KAUR; MUSKANPREET No. 24-2200 KAUR; GURWANSHPREET SINGH, Agency Nos.

A241-721-918

Petitioners, A241-721-917

A241-721-916

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 4, 2025** Portland, Oregon

Before: BYBEE and FORREST, Circuit Judges, and RODRIGUEZ, District Judge.***

Petitioners Rajwinder Kaur and her two children, natives and citizens of India,

petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) dismissal of their

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Xavier Rodriguez, United States District Judge for the Western District of Texas, sitting by designation. appeal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.