Brar

Brar v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 8, 202524-2610California630 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 8 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAGJIT SINGH BRAR, No. 24-2610 Agency No. Petitioner, A206-097-785 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 4, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: HURWITZ, KOH, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Jagjit Singh-Brar, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of a

decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal of an

order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying his applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel previously granted the parties’ joint motion to submit this case on the briefs [Dkt. 21]. (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.

1. Singh-Brar’s only challenge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.