People v. Vu CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 8, 2025C100818California2,959 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/8/25 P. v. Vu CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C100818

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 01F04848)

v.

HUNG VIET VU,

Defendant and Appellant.

Following a jury trial in 2004, defendant Hung Viet Vu was convicted of first degree murder with special circumstances and was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. In 2023, the trial court summarily denied Vu’s motion for a postjudgment evidence preservation proceeding under Penal Code section 1203.01,1 People v. Franklin (2016) 63 Cal.4th 261 (Franklin) and In re Cook (2019) 7 Cal.5th 439

Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.

1 (Cook) (Franklin/Cook…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.