United States v. Get Engineering Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20253:19-cv-01249California1,519 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. Case No.: 19-cv-1249-RSH-MSB

MC2 SABTECH HOLDINGS, INC.,

12 d/b/a “IXI TECHNOLOGY, INC.,” ORDER DENYING RELATOR’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS Plaintiff/Relator, 14 v. [ECF No. 265] 15 GET ENGINEERING CORP. et al.,

Defendants. 18 On March 7, 2025, Relator filed a motion for sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. ECF No. 265.1 Relator’s motion fails to comply with the local rules of this Court governing written motions. See CivLR 7.1(f)(1) (“Each motion or other request for ruling by the Court must include within it a Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support of the motion and a caption listing the nature of the motion, hearing date and time,

25 The motion as filed on the Court’s docket at ECF No. 265 contains redactions. An unredacted version has been filed under seal. See ECF Nos. 269 (order granting request to 27 and the judge who will hear the motion.”).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.