Short

Short v. ZBS Law LLP

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20253:24-cv-07908California3,578 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILTON C. SHORT, Case No. 24-cv-07908-RFL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS, DENYING MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, AND

ZBS LAW LLP, et al., DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE AS

MOOT

Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 36, 38, 41, 46,

Plaintiff Wilton C. Short, who is representing himself, brings this lawsuit against Defendants Bosco Credit, LLC and Franklin Credit Management Corp. stating six causes of action related to Defendants’ efforts to foreclose on 240 Buchanan Road, Pittsburg, CA 94565 (the “Property”). Because the amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 28, “FAC”) does not state a claim for relief, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 36, “MTD”) is GRANTED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND and Short’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. No. 41, “PI Motion”) and Emergency Request for Expedited Ruling on Pending Emergency Motion for Injunctive Relief (Dkt. No. 51) are DENIED. This ruling assumes the reader is familiar with the facts and the arguments made by the parties.

I. LEGAL STANDARD

In determining whether a complaint fails to state a claim, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.