Flickinger

Flickinger v. Castillo

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20255:24-cv-02915California4,795 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JASON ARCHIE FLICKINGER, Case No. 24-cv-02915-SVK

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART EX PARTE

APPLICATIONS

JAQUELINE REYES CASTILLO, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 27, 29 Defendants.

Self-represented plaintiff Jason Archie Flickinger commenced this action onMay 14, 2024 against 37 Defendants named in his amended complaint. Dkts. 1, 6. None of the Defendants have yet appeared. The Court has previously granted extensions of time to serve Defendants and adjudicated attendant service-related issues. See Dkts. 11, 21. Before the Court now are (1) Plaintiff’s ex parte application for authorization of service bypublication and extension of time for service as to Defendants Robert Crisp and Pedro Quintero (the “American Defendants”), (Dkt. 27); and (2) Plaintiff’s ex parte application for electronic service of process and extension of time for service as to various Defendants located in Mexico. The Court has determined that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.