(PC) Gaither v. Williams.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 BURRELL A. GAITHER, Case No.: 24-cv-01089-AJB-DDL
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
v. RECONSIDERATION S. WILLIAMS, A. GEORGE, SMITH,
S. AMADOR,
17 Defendants. 18 19 Before the Court is a letter filed by Burrell A. Gaither (“Plaintiff”). (Doc. No. 13.) As Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the Court construes the filing as a motion for reconsideration. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. I. BACKGROUND On June 21, 2024, Plaintiff filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and filed a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. Nos. 1; 2.) On July 12, 2024, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to proceed IFP and dismissed the Complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) & 1915A(b). (Doc. No. 10.) Plaintiff was granted leave to amend by September…