Arya
PPNP LLC v. Arya
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PPNP, LLC, Case No.: 25-cv-0790-AGS-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER REMANDING CASE v. Rahul N. ARYA, et al., Defendants. 8 Defendants removed this case, arising from a “breach of contract concerning a lease of real property” of a hotel, from state court based on federal-question jurisdiction. (ECF 1, at 2.) “‘Arising under’ jurisdiction—more often known as federal-question jurisdiction— enables federal courts to decide cases founded on federal law.” Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. v. Wullschleger, 604 U.S. 22, 26 (2025) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 1331). “A suit most typically falls within that statutory grant when federal law creates the cause of action asserted.” Id. (cleaned up). “On rare occasions, the grant also covers a suit containing state-law claims alone, because one or more of them necessarily raises a substantial and actually disputed federal question.” Id. (cleaned up). “That is, federal jurisdiction over a state law claim will lie if a federal issue is:…