Jiminez

(PC) Downs v. Jiminez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20252:22-cv-01021California479 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IVORY LEWIS DOWNS, JR., No. 2:22-cv-1021-TLN-AC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER M. JIMINEZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Ivory Lewis Downs, Jr. (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 10, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 37). This deadline has passed, and Plaintiff has not filed any objections. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.