Brown

(PC) Scott v. Brown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20252:23-cv-02749California439 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORGE SCOTT, No. 2:23-cv-2749-TLN-SCR-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER E. BROWN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff George Scott (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 13, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one (21) days. (ECF No. 13). Instead of filing objections, Plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to file a first amended complaint. (ECF No. 14). On January 6, 2025, the magistrate judge granted plaintiff sixty days in which to file a first amended complaint. (ECF No. 15). Plaintiff was advised that the findings and recommendations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.