UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 || FLOR JIMENEZ, et al., Case No. 2:23-cv-03028-TLN-CSK Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
V. (ECF No. 32) || HYATT CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. 16 The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated protective order below (ECF No. 18 || 32), and finds it comports with the relevant authorities and the Court’s Local Rule. See 19 || L.-R. 141.1. The Court APPROVES the protective order, subject to the following 90 || clarification. The Court’s Local Rules indicate that once an action is closed, it “will not retain 92 || jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in that action.” L.R. 141.1(f); see Bylin Heating Sys., Inc. v. Thermal Techs., Inc., 2012 WL 13237584, at *2 94 || (E.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2012) (noting that courts in the district generally do not retain 25 || jurisdiction for disputes concerning protective orders after closure of the case). Thus, the 26 || Court…