(PC) Turner v. Contra Costa County Sheriff's

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20252:24-cv-00239California342 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY R. TURNER, Case No. 2:24-cv-0239-TLN-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER W. WESTON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Anthony R. Turner (“Plaintiff”), a civil detainee proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 21, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on plaintiff, and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. This deadline has passed and Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.