(PC) Kern v. Superior Court of CA, County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20252:24-cv-02149California315 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES CURTIS KERN, No. 2:24-cv-02149-TLN-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff James Curtis Kern (“Plaintiff”) proceeds without counsel in this civil rights 18 action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On February 20, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 22 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. This deadline has passed and 23 neither party has filed objections. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.