Bondi

Martinez Ramirez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 9, 202524-1126California771 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 9 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN CARLOS MARTINEZ No. 24-1126 RAMIREZ; JULIA TAHOMY VASQUEZ Agency Nos.

MEJIA; TAHOMY DARIANA A220-146-683

MARTINEZ VASQUEZ; LUCAS A220-146-684

SEBASTIAN MARTINEZ VASQUEZ,

A220-146-685

A220-146-686

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM* PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 4, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: GILMAN***, M. SMITH, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Ronald Lee Gilman, United States Circuit Judge for the Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit, sitting by designation. Juan Carlos Martinez Ramirez and his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.