Bondi

Gante Cornejo v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 9, 202524-2685California779 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 9 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YESENIA GANTE CORNEJO; FIDEL No. 24-2685 MENDOZA GANTE; RAMON Agency Nos.

MENDOZA GANTE; YESENIA A209-763-040

MENDOZA GANTE, A209-763-041

A209-763-042

Petitioners,

A209-763-043

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 2, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: GILMAN***, M. SMITH, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Yesenia Gante Cornejo and her three children, natives and citizens of Mexico,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Ronald Lee Gilman, United States Circuit Judge for the Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit, sitting by designation. petition for review of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.