CelLink Corp. v. Manaflex LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CELLINK CORP., Case No. 23-cv-04231-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS
MANAFLEX LLC, ROBERT LANE,
v. AND AUGUSTO BARTON’S MOTION
TO DISMISS
MANAFLEX LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 121 Defendants.
12 Pending before the Court is Defendants Manaflex LLC (“Manaflex”), Robert Lane, Augusto Barton’s (collectively, “Defendants”) motion to dismiss Counts IV and VII-IX of Plaintiff CelLink Corp.’s (“CelLink”) First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Dkt. No. 121 (“Mot.”). The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and takes it under submission. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion. I. BACKGROUND On August 18, 2023, CelLink filed suit against Defendant Manaflex, accusing Manaflex of infringing U.S. Patent No. 11,116,070 (the “’070 Patent”) and misappropriating CelLink’s trade secrets under the Defend Trade Secrets Act…