Oracle America, Inc. v. Procore Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 9, 20254:24-cv-07457California4,941 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ORACLE AMERICA, INC., et al., Case No. 24-cv-07457-JST

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO

v. COMPEL ARBITRATION, TO STAY,

AND TO DISMISS

PROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Re: ECF Nos. 38, 40 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Defendant Mark Mariano’s motion to compel arbitration and to stay proceedings or, in the alternative, to dismiss, ECF No. 38, and Defendants Procore Technologies, Inc. and Procore Payment Services, Inc.’s motion to stay or, in the alternative, to dismiss, ECF No. 40. The Court will deny the motions. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND A. Oracle’s Allegations1 Plaintiff Oracle hired Defendant Mariano when Oracle acquired his previous employer in 2016. ECF No. 1 ¶ 49. Mariano worked for Oracle until October 29, 2021, and during that time he “had a front row seat to . . . Oracle’s technical development of” its Textura Payment Management (“TPM”) solution and related enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) integrations. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.