(PC) King v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 9, 20251:23-cv-00805California586 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LARRY LOUIS KING, No. 1:23-cv-00805 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

v. (ECF No. 16). K. CLARK, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff has filed a motion for the appointment of counsel. ECF No. 16. For the reasons stated below, the motion will be denied. I. MOTION FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL On March 4, 2025, Plaintiff’s notice of current address was docketed as the Court had recently directed. ECF No. 16. In the notice, Plaintiff also requests to “renew his request for counsel” after his case has been screened. Id. at 2. Plaintiff, however, provides no factual support for this request. See generally ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.