Windham

Windham v. Howard

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 9, 20253:24-cv-09344California1,300 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROSALYN ANGELA WINDHAM EL, Case No. 24-cv-09344-DMR

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:

v. SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

MERCIDEL HOWARD, et al., Defendants.

Self-represented Plaintiff Rosalyn Angela Windham El (“Windham”) filed a complaint and an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). [Docket Nos. 1, 2.] Windham alleges that she is a Moorish American National and “ancient American Inhabitant Executor Fiduciary and Successor Trustee of [a] Trust in Fee Simple Absolute,” a property with address 2943 Chestnut St, Emeryville CA 94608. [See Docket No. 1 (“Compl.”) at ECF 8.] The complaint seeks the ejection from this property of “all squatter persons, principle, agents, heirs and assign named on the grant deed and all current improvements” [id.], presumably the two individual Defendants who are alleged to reside at the 2943 Chestnut St property [id. at 2].1 The court considers Windham’s complaint and IFP…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.