Floyd
Floyd v. Crunch Fitness - San Jose
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MICHAEL FLOYD, Case No. 24-cv-08314-VKD
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE
v. DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF SUBJECT
MATTER JURISDICTION
CRUNCH FITNESS - SAN JOSE, Re: Dkt. Nos. 1, 9, 12 Defendant.
13 Michael Floyd, who is representing himself, filed a petition seeking an order vacating an arbitration award resulting from a dispute with Bay Area Crunchers, LLC, doing business as Crunch Fit (“Crunch Fit”). Dkt. No. 1. Crunch Fit opposed Mr. Floyd’s petition and moved for an order affirming the arbitration award. Dkt. No. 12. The parties appeared at an April 8, 2025 hearing on their respective motions. Dkt. No. 21. In an April 7, 2025 order, the Court invited the parties’ responses regarding whether it has subject matter jurisdiction over this action, in view of Badgerow v. Walters, 596 U.S. 1 (2022). Dkt. No. 25. The Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”)2 does not itself create federal…