Radford
Radford v. Aera Energy Services Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 CHRISTOPHER RADFORD, an No. 1:24-CV-00921-KES-CDB individual, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO REMAND AND DENYING
Plaintiff, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT
ON THE PLEADINGS
v. Docs. 25, 29 AERA ENERGY SERVICES COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, and DOES 1 through 50, Defendants. 21 Plaintiff Christopher Radford (“Radford”), on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, moves to remand this action to Kern County Superior Court. Doc. 29 (“MTR”). Separately, defendants Aera Energy Services Company (“Aera”) and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, move for judgment on the pleadings. Doc. 25 (“MJP”). The parties filed oppositions and replies to both motions. Docs. 30, 31, 34, 36. The Court held oral argument on February 10, 2025. Doc. 37. For the reasons set forth below, Radford’s motion to remand is granted and Aera’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is…