Ayodele
Smith v. Ayodele
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 9, 20251:24-cv-01562California821 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CANDACE SMITH, Case No. 1:24-cv-01562-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER CONSTRUING PLAINTIFF’S LODGED
AMENDED COMPLAINT AS MOTION FOR
v.
LEAVE TO AMEND
OLUSSEYI AYODELE, (Doc. 9)
Defendant. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO AMEND
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT LODGED ON
MARCH 18, 2025 AS THIRD AMENDED
COMPLAINT
(Doc. 9)
20 Plaintiff Candace Smith (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this civil action on December 18, 2025. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff filed a signed first amended complaint on February 7, 2025. (Doc. 6.) On February 18, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The Court determined that the amended complaint failed to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and failed to state a cognizable claim for relief. The Court 27 …