(PS) Devi v. Sacramento Bhartiya Sabha

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VINEETA DEVI, No. 2:24-cv-00689-DJC-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER v. SACRAMENTO BHARTIYA SABHA, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 On March 13, 2025, defendant Sacramento Bhartiya Sabha filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff Vineeta Devi’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) and noticed the motion for hearing on April 23, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned. (ECF No. 20.) On March 18, 2025, defendant City of Sacramento filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s FAC and noticed the motion for hearing on April 17, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned. (ECF No. 21.) On the Court’s own motion, defendant City of Sacramento’s motion was reset for hearing on April 23, 2025. (ECF No. 22.) Pursuant to this court’s Local Rules, any opposition to the motions was to be filed and served no later than fourteen (14) days after the date the motion was filed. Further, a responding party who has no opposition to the granting of the motion is required to serve and file 27 1…