Caramello

(PC) Jackson v. Caramello

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 9, 20252:24-cv-02542California269 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELIJIAH LEE JACKSON, No. 2:24-cv-2542 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND CARAMELLO, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 On February 25, 2025, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed with leave to file a second amended complaint. The second amended complaint was due on March 27, 2025, but plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.