Uprety

Uprety v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 10, 202523-4255California1,046 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PRAMESH RAJ UPRETY, No. 23-4255 Agency No. Petitioner, A240-454-402 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 25, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN and OWENS, Circuit Judges, and KENDALL, District Judge.***

Pramesh Raj Uprety petitions for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (BIA) decision dismissing his appeal and affirming denial of asylum and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Virginia M. Kendall, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation. withholding of removal.1 Uprety, a Nepali citizen born in Kathmandu, arrived in

the United States in 1989…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.