Uprety
Uprety v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 10, 202523-4255California1,046 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 10 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PRAMESH RAJ UPRETY, No. 23-4255 Agency No. Petitioner, A240-454-402 v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 25, 2025** Seattle, Washington
Before: McKEOWN and OWENS, Circuit Judges, and KENDALL, District Judge.***
Pramesh Raj Uprety petitions for review of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (BIA) decision dismissing his appeal and affirming denial of asylum and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Virginia M. Kendall, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation. withholding of removal.1 Uprety, a Nepali citizen born in Kathmandu, arrived in
the United States in 1989…