Bondi

Prada Garcia v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 10, 202524-2173California943 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SANDRO PRADA GARCIA; YESICA No. 24-2173 ALEJANDRA BARRETO Agency Nos.

NINO; MARLON ESTEBAN PRADA A240-249-950

ACOSTA; DANA SOFIA PRADA A220-773-310

BARRETO,

A220-773-384

A220-773-385

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 8, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN, DESAI, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Lead petitioner Sandro Prada Garcia, his wife Yesica, and their two minor

children (collectively, “petitioners”) petition for review of a Board of Immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Appeals (“BIA”) decision…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.