Patel

Patel v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 10, 202524-3293California1,226 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BHAVIN PATEL, Individually and as No. 24-3293 Trustee of the Patel Family D.C. No. Trust; JERUBHA LIFE LLC, 2:24-cv-00493-PA-PD Plaintiffs - Appellants,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation; MATTHEW LUM; DOES, 1- 10 inclusive,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 8, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and BADE and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiffs Bhavin Patel and Jerubha Life LLC, owner and operator of the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). New Bay Motel (the “Motel”) in Los Angeles, California, challenge the Motel’s

nuisance closure by Defendants City…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.