United States v. Ronald Moschella

Caution
727 F.3d 888·2013 WL 4082029·2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 16838
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 14, 201311-50377California2,103 words

Opinion

Opinion

Zipps, J.

Opinion by Judge Zipps

OPINION

Defendant Ronald Dean Mosehella pleaded guilty to five counts of mail fraud and two counts of wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 and 1343. He was subsequently sentenced to 63 months’ imprisonment and 3 years’ supervised release. On appeal, Defendant claims: (1) the government breached the plea agreement by arguments it made at sentencing; (2) the district court failed to give notice of its intent to impose a sentence above the range suggested by the Sentencing Guidelines as required by Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(h); (3) the district court erred in ordering restitution for two newly-discovered victims; and (4) the district court lacked legal authority to impose Special Condition 8 as a condition of supervision. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (a), and we affirm.

I. Background

Shortly after the government filed an information charging Mosehella with five counts of mail fraud and two counts of wire fraud, Mosehella pleaded guilty to all seven counts pursuant to a written plea agreement. In the agreement, the government agreed to recommend a sentence of imprisonment no higher than the low end of the applicable Sentencing Guidelines…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.