Ahir
Ahir v. City of Los Angeles
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 10 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NIKESHKUMAR AHIR; PINTUBEN No. 24-2268 NIKESHKUMAR AHIR; PAWANPUTRA D.C. No. 108, INC., 2:23-cv-05626-MWF-PVC Plaintiffs - Appellants,
MEMORANDUM*
v.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation; LOS ANGELES
DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND
POWER; RYAN TAGUINES; MATTHEW
LUM; DOES, 1-10 Inclusive,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 8, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and BADE and SUNG, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Plaintiffs Nikeshkumar Ahir, Pintuben Nikeshkumar Ahir, and Pawanputra
108 Inc. owned and operated the 108 Motel (the…