Ahir

Ahir v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 10, 202524-2268California1,201 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NIKESHKUMAR AHIR; PINTUBEN No. 24-2268 NIKESHKUMAR AHIR; PAWANPUTRA D.C. No. 108, INC., 2:23-cv-05626-MWF-PVC Plaintiffs - Appellants,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation; LOS ANGELES

DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND

POWER; RYAN TAGUINES; MATTHEW

LUM; DOES, 1-10 Inclusive,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 8, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and BADE and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Plaintiffs Nikeshkumar Ahir, Pintuben Nikeshkumar Ahir, and Pawanputra

108 Inc. owned and operated the 108 Motel (the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.