In Re Meta Pixel Healthcare Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20253:22-cv-03580California1,472 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IN RE META PIXEL HEALTHCARE Case No. 22-cv-03580-WHO (VKD)

LITIGATION

REDACTED This Document Relates To: ORDER RE MARCH 14, 2025

DISCOVERY DISPUTE RE

All Actions. ZUCKERBERG DEPOSITION Re: Dkt. No. 909

12 The parties ask the Court to resolve their dispute regarding whether plaintiffs should be permitted to take the deposition of Mark Zuckerberg, Meta’s CEO. Dkt. No. 909. The Court finds this dispute suitable for resolution without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits “[a] party . . . [to] depose any person, including a party, without leave of court . . . .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(a)(1). However, under Rule 26(c)(1), “[t]he court may, for good cause, issue an order to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense,” including forbidding a deposition, or limiting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.