Marin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MEL MARIN, Case No.: 23-cv-336-RSH-BLM

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

DANIEL MARSHALL,

FOR RECONSIDERATION, AND

Defendant. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE

16 [ECF Nos. 87, 88, 89] 17 18 Before the Court is a motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Daniel Marshall [ECF No. 87] and a motion for reconsideration and motion in limine brought by Plaintiff Mel Marin [ECF Nos. 88, 89]. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1(d)(1), the Court finds the motions presented appropriate for resolution without oral argument. For the reasons below, the Court grants Defendant’s motion and denies Plaintiff’s motions. I. BACKGROUND A. Plaintiff’s Allegations The instant action arises from unlawful detainer proceedings brought against Plaintiff in California Superior Court. Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) 28 …