Justino Rupard v. County of San Diego
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 23cv1357 CAB (BLM) JUSTINO RUPARD, et al.,
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
v. [ECF No. 186] COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., Defendant. 16 17 Currently before the Court is Defendant County of San Diego’s (“County”) February 21, 2025 Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s February 5, 2025 Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel [ECF No. 186 ("Mot.")], Plaintiffs’ Opposition [ECF No. 188 ("Oppo.")], and the County’s Reply [ECF No. 195 ("Reply")]. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS 22 the County’s motion for reconsideration.1 RELEVANT BACKGROUND On December 6, 2024, Plaintiffs filed a motion to compel the County to produce ten (10) Critical Incident Review Board (“CIRB”) reports, along with other documents and presentations
26 1 In the same Motion, the County also filed objections to this Court’s February 5, 2025 Order. ECF No. 186. This Court defers the…