Bernard Brown, Jr. v. Marcus Pollard

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 9, 20252:22-cv-06755California897 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BERNARD BROWN, JR., Case No. 2:22-cv-06755-FLA (KSx)

Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS v. AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

MARCUS POLLARD,

JUDGE

Respondent.

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the court has reviewed the Motion to Amend, Dkts. 32, 33, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). Dkt. 43. Further, the court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. Dkt. 45. Petitioner requests leave to amend his habeas petition, which is still pending, with four additional claims. Dkt. 33. The Report recommends denial of leave to amend because the proposed claims are untimely or duplicative. Dkt. 43. Petitioner’s objections to the Report, Dkt. 45, fail to warrant any change to the Report’s proposed findings or recommendations. Petitioner…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.