Iniguez

Iniguez v. ONTRAC LOGISTICS, INC.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20253:24-cv-05854California1,979 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 MARITZA V. INIGUEZ, Case No. 24-cv-05854-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE REMAND

v.

ONTRAC LOGISTICS, INC., et al., Defendants.

9 Plaintiff Maritza Iniguez sued her former employer OnTrac Logistics, Inc. (OnTrac) and seven OnTrac employees, alleging California state law claims of disability discrimination, retaliation, and wrongful termination, among other claims. See Dkt. No. 1-3 (Compl.). Iniguez originally filed the case in Alameda County Superior Court, and defendants removed the action to this Court on an allegation of traditional diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1). Dkt. No. 1. Iniguez asks for a remand to state court. Dkt. No. 12. The parties’ familiarity with the record is assumed, and the case is remanded to state court. The parties agree that Iniguez and OnTrac have diverse citizenship. See Dkt. No. 1; Dkt. No. 12 at 3. They disagree about the effect of the individual defendants -- Sergio Mendoza, Mark Mohead, Eugene Granadosin, Marie Sadler,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.