Board of Trustees of the Bay Area Roofers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Elite Waterproofing & Epoxy Flooring

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20253:24-cv-08468California1,210 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE BAY Case No. 24-cv-08468-MMC

AREA ROOFERS HEALTH &

8 WELFARE TRUST FUND, et al., ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' 9 Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT

JUDGMENT; VACATING HEARING

v. 10

11 ELITE WATERPROOFING & EPOXY

FLOORING,

12 Defendant. 13 14 Before the Court is plaintiffs'1 Motion, filed March 11, 2025, "for Entry of Default 15 Judgment." Defendant Elite Waterproofing & Epoxy Flooring ("Elite"), although served 16 with the motion, has not filed a response.2 Having read and considered the papers filed in 17 support of the motion, the Court finds the matter appropriate for determination thereon, 18 VACATES the hearing scheduled for April 25, 2025, and rules as follows. 19 The allegations in a complaint other than those relating to the amount of damages 20 are, upon entry of default, "taken as true." See Geddes v. United Financial Group, 559 21 F.2d 557, 560 (9th Cir.1977). Here, the Clerk of Court, on February 14, 2025, entered 22 the default of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.