Secretary

(PC) Rood v. Secretary

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20251:22-cv-00449California653 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COLTON JAMES ROOD, No. 1:22-cv-00449-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO STAY PROCEEDINGS, AND

v. GRANTING PLAINTIFF THIRTY DAYS TO

FILE A RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S

SECRETARY OF CDCR, et al., MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

AND MOTION TO COMPEL

Defendants. (ECF No. 81)

17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ECF No. 62.) 19 This action proceeds against Defendant E. Carrillo for deliberate indifference and retaliation. 20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to stay the proceedings, filed on April 7, 21 2025. (ECF No. 81.) 22 On March 7, 2025, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust 23 the administrative remedies. (ECF No. 77.) Then, on March 10, 2025, Defendant filed a motion 24 to compel responses to discovery requests served on Plaintiff. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.