Secretary
(PC) Rood v. Secretary
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COLTON JAMES ROOD, No. 1:22-cv-00449-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO STAY PROCEEDINGS, AND
v. GRANTING PLAINTIFF THIRTY DAYS TO
FILE A RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S
SECRETARY OF CDCR, et al., MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND MOTION TO COMPEL
Defendants. (ECF No. 81)
17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ECF No. 62.) 19 This action proceeds against Defendant E. Carrillo for deliberate indifference and retaliation. 20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to stay the proceedings, filed on April 7, 21 2025. (ECF No. 81.) 22 On March 7, 2025, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust 23 the administrative remedies. (ECF No. 77.) Then, on March 10, 2025, Defendant filed a motion 24 to compel responses to discovery requests served on Plaintiff. …