Doody
Doody v. Richman Property Services, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NINA DOODY, et al., Case No.: 3:24-cv-01557-JES-BLM
Plaintiffs,
ORDER:
v. (1) GRANTING MOTION TO RICHMAN PROPERTY SERVICES,
REMAND;
INC. et al., 15 Defendants. (2) DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS
AS MOOT
17 [ECF Nos. 6, 13]
19 On July 31, 2024, Plaintiffs Nina Doody and Brandon Lee (“Plaintiffs”) initiated 20 this action against Defendant Richman Property Services, Inc. (“Richman”) for violation 21 of California’s Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act (“ICRAA”) in the 22 Superior Court of San Diego, State of California. ECF No. 1, Notice of Removal (“NOR”). 23 On September 3, 2024, Richman removed this action to federal court, asserting diversity 24 jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). See generally NOR. On September 27, 2024, 25 Plaintiffs filed a motion to remand. ECF No. 13 (“Motion”). Richman filed an opposition. 26 ECF No. 21 (“Opp’n”). Richman also filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 6. Plaintiffs filed 27 an opposition, and Richman filed a reply to such motion. ECF…