Tillman

Tillman v. Richman Property Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20253:24-cv-01598California4,160 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATALIE TILLMAN, et al., Case No.: 3:24-cv-01598-JES-BLM

Plaintiffs,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING MOTION TO RICHMAN PROPERTY SERVICES,

REMAND;

INC. et al., 15 Defendants. (2) DENYING MOTION TO

TRANSFER OR IN THE

ALTERNATIVE, MOTION TO

DISMISS AS MOOT

[ECF Nos. 7, 16]

20 On August 5, 2024, Plaintiffs Natalie Tillman and David Tillman (“Plaintiffs”) 21 initiated this action against Defendant Richman Property Services, Inc. (“Richman”) for 22 violation of California’s Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act (“ICRAA”) in 23 the Superior Court of San Diego, California. ECF No. 1 ¶ 1, Notice of Removal (“NOR”). 24 On September 9, 2024, Richman removed this action to federal court, asserting diversity 25 jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). See generally NOR. On September 30, 2024, 26 Plaintiffs filed a motion to remand. ECF No. 16 (“Motion”). Richman filed an opposition. 27 ECF No. 24 (“Opp’n”). Richman also…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.