Nnamdi Franklin Ojimba v. B. Birkholz
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NNAMDI FRANKLIN OJIMBA, Case No. 2:24-cv-06570-HDV (BFM)
Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
B. BIRKHOLZ, Respondent. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Report recommends the denial of the Petition and the dismissal of this action with prejudice. (ECF No. 13.) The Report also finds that, to the extent that Petitioner might be alleging a civil rights claim, based on alleged retaliation by a federal officer, conversion of this habeas action to a civil rights action is not warranted. (Id. at 4 n.2.) Petitioner’s objections to the Report (ECF No. 19) do not warrant a change to the Report’s findings or…