Melton

Melton v. Regional Center of the East Bay, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20254:20-cv-06613California1,244 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SELENA MELTON, Case No. 20-cv-06613-YGR (TSH)

Plaintiff,

DISCOVERY ORDER

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 218, 220, 221 REGIONAL CENTER OF THE EAST

BAY, INC.,

11 Defendant. 12 On May 16, 2023, Plaintiff served Defendant RCEB with her first set of requests for admission (“RFAs”). RFA 61 asked RCEB to “Admit that before July 2022 neither you nor Arleen’s arranged for Plaintiff to have an ASL interpreter for any medical visit.” RFA 62 asked RCEB to “Admit that you knew in the time period before July 2022 that Arleen’s did not arrange for Plaintiff to have an ASL interpreter for any medical visit.” RCEB admitted both RFAs. On June 10, 2024 RCEB received copies of Plaintiff’s medical records that it now contends show these admissions were untrue. RCEB sat on its hands for about 10 months, and then six days before the close of fact discovery filed the present joint discovery letter brief seeking to withdraw these admissions. ECF No. 218. Fact discovery is now closed. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.