Brazil

(PC) Bazzo v. Brazil

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20251:24-cv-00768California691 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANK MONACO BAZZO, No. 1:24-cv-00768 JLT BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

v. ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE

TO STATE A CLAIM

BRAZIL, et al., (Doc. 14) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Frank Monaco Bazzo is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 16, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge screened the complaint and issued an order for Plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed as barred by res judicata and/or the Rooker-Feldman doctrine given the substantially similar, unsuccessful action filed by Plaintiff in state court. (Doc. 12); see also Bazzo v. Brazil, No. F085521, 2024 WL 797132, at *1 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 27, 2024). Following Plaintiff’s failure to file a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.