Matthew D. Van Steenwyk v. Kedrin E. Van Steenwyk

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 9, 20252:24-cv-07401California4,584 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WESTERN DIVISON

9 MATTHEW D. VAN STEENWYK, Case No.: 2:24-cv-07401-FLA (AJRx) Individually, as Trustee and Beneficiary of The Matthew Van Steenwyk GST Hon. Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha T Isr su us et Tan rud s T t,h ae n M d aa st t Che ow -T V rua sn te S et e oe f n Tw hy ek Gretchen Marie Van Steenwyk-Marsh [PROPOSED] STIPULATED GST Trust and The Gretchen Marie Van PROTECTIVE ORDER Steenwyk-Marsh Issue Trust;

GRETCHEN VAN STEENWYK-

MARSH, individually,

Plaintiffs, v. KEDRIN E. VAN STEENWYK, Individually, as Successor Trustee of the Donald H. Van Steenwyk and Elizabeth A. Van Steenwyk 1996 Revocable Trust and Survivor’s Trust, and as Executor of the Estate of Elizabeth Van Steenwyk; DANIEL CARTER, Individually; KIERAN DUGGAN, Individually; PAMELA PIERCE, Individually; JOSEPH MCCOY, Individually; S. WESTLEY SHEDD, Individually; STEPHEN ORR, Individually; GORDON THOMSON, Individually; TRENTON THORNOCK, Individually; ROBERT KERR, Individually; ADELAIDA…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.